🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.